Solution Series Event Encore
Digital Discrimination & Historical Solutions
Join the 100,000+ People Who've Signed These Petitions calling for investigations
Businesses That Support Vaccine Passports, Support Discrimination
The Green Book
Big THANK YOU to Kevin Jenkins, Sheila Ealey, Attorney Tricia Lindsay, and Dr. Michelle Gamble for sharing their wisdom in this CC’21 Solution Series Event.
After publishing our first peer-reviewed paper COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective in October 2020 we knew we were going to need a lot of help getting the message out that major US federal laws had been significantly violated by government agencies and officials resulting in a hyperinflation of COVID data that has fraudulently influenced public health policy and public perception. We are eternally grateful to Leah Wilson and everyone at Stand For Health Freedom for all of their tireless support. More information, including formal grand jury petition that can be used in any state, can be found below.
GET FREE ACCESS TO ALL DAY ONE RECORDINGS
Be our special guest for COVID CON ’21 on and get free access to all video recordings so you can be part of the solution and make history!
Want Full Access To Recordings, Resources, Bonus Materials & Solutions For All 3 Days Of This Historic Conference? Click on any button that Says ‘GET FULL ACCESS TO EVERYTHING!’
The Data Didn't Lie... People Did.
We began reviewing the scientific literature and tracking daily data from Italy, South Korea, China and the U.S. on March 12th, 2020. By mid-April, it was very clear that the high-risk demographic would be people over 50 years of age and with multiple pre-existing (comorbid) conditions, but for everyone else COVID would be a highly recoverable infection as has proven to be the case particularly with immune priming and early treatment strategies.
On March 24, 2020, the CDC published the infamous COVID Alert No. 2 that significantly de-emphasized pre-existing conditions (comorbidities) by relegating them to section 2 of the death certificate dealing with contributing factors, while simultaneously incentivizing COVID diagnosis, even in presumed cases, and placing COVID in part 1 of the death certificate dealing with causes of death. Nevermind, that this is not how death certificates had been reported for the previous 17 years for all other causes of death.
Then, on April 15, 2020, the CDC adopted the April 5, 2020 position statement (Interim-20-ID-01) from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologist (CSTE) allowing for COVID to be diagnosed from a single cough and offering no methodology for ensuring the same person could not be counted multiple times. In essence, the CDC effectively outsourced the responsibility for developing clinical definitions for what constitutes a COVID case to a non-profit organization heavily funded by special interest dollars, but not before providing FOUR subject matter experts to the CSTE for the development of this attempted bypass of federal oversight. The CDC is filled with brilliant epidemiologists and doctors, why outsource these crucial decisions to a non-profit organization? Why adopt the position statement without public comment or federal oversight?
These changes in data definition, collection, and analysis were made only for COVID. The changes were implemented by the CDC by allegedly violating the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), and Information Quality Act (IQA). These 3 Federal Laws ensure that federal agencies follow compulsory process, open public comment for all proposed changes to data collection and analysis, and also notify the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of any proposed changes. The OMB then provides independent oversight to ensure accuracy of data, transparency throughout the process, and ensure that the federal agency requesting the change is in full compliance with the law. So why didn’t any of this happen? Emergency situations do not render federal laws null and void.
On August 5, 2020 the CSTE modestly amended their April 5th, 2020 position statement and published (Interim-20-ID-02), but it was too little, too late as the catastrophic damage had already been done and the data chaos created by the CDC’s alleged rogue actions were now devastating every person and every business in the world. Hyperinflated data now ruled public health policy and public perception. To help you orient yourself, we have provided a video below and the exhibits we have provided to US Attorneys and the Department of Justice alerting them to the alleged malfeasance.
Audit Every Death certificate
In October 2020, COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective was published in the journal Public Health Policy Initiative by the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge.
In March of 2021, the COVID research team took the liberty of collecting, organizing, and publishing hundreds of references in this wide-ranging, peer-reviewed magnum opus, COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Health Crisis. The peer-reviewed scientific literature and clinical evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that asymptomatic transmission is a failed theory, PCR testing is fatally flawed, evidence-based treatments exist, projection models have been massively inaccurate, clinical trials for the experimental biologics have not demonstrated safety or effectiveness, and that the greatest freedoms under assault are compassion, love, and moral courage in medicine.
In June of 2021, the Santa Clara County California public health department performed a ‘soft’ audit of death certificate records where COVID was listed as the cause of death and found that the data was hyperinflated by 22%.
In July of 2021, the Alameda County California public health department performed a ‘soft’ audit of death certificate records where COVID was listed as the cause of death and found that the data was hyperinflated by 25%.
Soft audits of death certificates entail removing obvious reporting inaccuracies such as car accidents, physical accidents, etc. being counted as COVID caused deaths.
Full audits of death certificates, which my research team has been calling for for more than a year, entail a review of full medical records, including any autopsy results, so the cause of death can be definitively confirmed.
Santa Clara County and Alameda County California are large population centers and prove our point that the changes adopted by the CDC in violation of federal law led to inaccurate data that significantly hyperinflated case, hospitalization, and death counts. To make matters worse, these inaccuracies were rewarded with a higher Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement and no consequences as yet for the massive errors that have compromised all published COVID data.
The image above displays 5 columns of data for data published through August 18, 2021 for COVID.
Looking left to right, column one displays that COVID death count published by the CDC. This is the total number of deaths published using the March 24th, 2020 COVID Alert No. 2.
The 2nd column displays a projected value assuming that soft audits of all death certificates would be similar to what occurred in Santa Clara & Alameda Counties and produce a 25% reduction in death counts.
The middle column displays the projected maximum reduction in death counts if a full audit of all records was based upon the 2003 death certificate reporting handbooks published by the CDC and still in use for all causes of death except COVID. It is important to note that the CDC states as of September 26, 2021 that, “For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.” This statement has remained unchanged since at least July 2021.
The 4th column is the total number of deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) as of August 20, 2021.
The 5th column is the estimated number of actual deaths based upon the case filing filed by attorney Tom Renz in the US District Court of Alabama on July 19, 2021, which asserts under penalty of perjury that data being reported to VAERS is significantly underreported by a factor of 5 at the very minimum.
Collectively, this graphic contends that a full audit of all COVID death certificates could reveal that more people have died in connection with the experimental COVID inoculations than due to complications from the SARS-CoV-2 infection had federal laws not been violated, hyperinflating COVID data published by the CDC.
Formal Grand Jury Petition
disclaimer & compliance
***All Information Shared On This Website Is Public Domain & For Educational Purposes. Information Can Be Shared Freely With The Understanding That All Statements Have Not Been Evaluated By The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Go Here For A Current List Of The FDA’s Position On Various Therapeutic Interventions. We Are Required To Inform You That Any Information Presented On This Site (Including Within The Videos) Is Not Intended To Advise, Diagnose, Treat, Cure Or Prevent Any Disease Including COVID. Additionally, We Are Required To Inform You That Any Information Presented On This Site (Including Within the Videos) Is Not Intended To Constitute Legal Advice Or Service. Always Consult With Qualified Licensed Medical Professionals & Legal Experts Before Enacting Any Information Presented Herein.***
***Please Be Aware That At No Time Will We Offer Advice, Guidance, Or Direction With Respect To Whether Or Not An Individual Should Or Should Not Receive COVID Inoculations Still In Clinical Trial According To The National Institutes Of Health (NIH). We Encourage All People To Review Available Safety & Efficacy Data, Published By The CDC Through The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) And The CDC’s COVID Data Tracker, With Their Trusted Healthcare Team And Make The Decision That Is Right For Them. We Support Every Individual’s Rights As Patients To Agree To Or Decline Any Medical Procedure As Stated In The American Medical Association’s Code Of Medical Ethics 1.1.3(d).***
***In A Transparent Effort To Be In Full Compliance With The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Regarding Prevention, Treatment, & Deceptive Practices (15 U.S. Code § 57b & Section 19 of the FTC Act), We Are Required To Notify You That The Information Presented On This Website Is A Collection Of Peer-Reviewed Empirical Evidence, But Has Not Yet Been Evaluated By The FDA For Safety & Efficacy. None Of The Information Provided Is Intended To Replace The Care And Supervision Of Qualified Licensed Medical Professional Or The Legal Advice Of Licensed Attorneys. Additionally In Full Disclosure, We Do Not Endorse Any Products, Companies Or Services.***
BE PART OF THE SOLUTION AT COVID CON '21
COVID CON '21 - Solution summit
What can you do to be part of the solution? Get full access to all event recordings, resources, and solutions and find out how much power you really possess!